I seem to be getting loads of hits recently on “Bowmont sheep”. So, here is a summary of information people might be looking for both as wool users and farmers thinking of keeping the animals.
The Bowmont was developed 25 years ago by The Macaulay Institute in Scotland to be an extra source of income for struggling Scottish hill farmers. The idea was to produce a hardy hill sheep with the finest possible quality wool. To that end they crossed white Shetland ewes with Merino rams and crossed the resulting females back to more Merino rams largely by AI to ensure the best quality genetics. That was only the beginning because the resulting animals needed years of refinement and hard work to produce the Bowmonts I have here today, i.e good consistent animals which produce fleeces between 15 and 20microns.
There was never much interest in the project by Scottish hill farmers largely because they wanted bigger meat lambs from the Bowmont (which will produce a hill type lamb if run at a minimal level) and kept crossing them out to other breed rams so losing the wool quality. They were also not as tough as was thought at first and failed to thrive in the harsh hill environment. The same problem arose more recently in Wales when ADAS bought some and promptly lost many through weather conditions and Johnes disease. They also crossed out to more Shetland rams to increase hardiness and lost wool quality. The small Bowmont flock in Wales is now mainly first cross rather than pure Bowmont sheep and may not last much longer since there is only one ram which they bought two years ago from me. The sheep are not ideal for a commercial hill farm as ADAS have discovered.
The sheep I have here were bought from the research farm in Scotland after a great deal of thought. I was conscious of some pressure on me by the staff up there to keep the breed going. They knew I had their cashmere goats and was interested in fibre quality above everything else. It was a big commitment, taking on the result of 20+ years work by a very dedicated, high powered team of staff. I am very fortunate that they have all continued their strong interest in these animals (and the cashmere goats) and fall over backwards to help me at every turn.
I did it with considerable trepidation since I had never kept sheep, and now have the only pure Bowmont flock in the country. Each sheep has a pedigree longer than mine and can be traced back to the original Shetland/Merino cross. Each sheep also has full fibre test details. This is something which in my view is not an “optional extra” but an essential part of maintaining a wool flock. Claims of quality are meaningless unless they can be backed up by pure science.
I currently have a flock of 50 sheep and will be increasing as rapidly as the girls can manage! The three rams I shall be using for breeding this year have Mean fibre Diametre results of 16.7, 17.0 and 17.4microns respectively with a CV of under 20. (Consistently fine for those who don’t have in depth knowledge of this type of statistic. This puts these rams in the Super Fine Merino class and, on a world stage, classes their wool as fine as cashmere. (My own cashmere here is much lower than this but the international accepted upper limit is 18.5 microns. )
From a management point of view, the sheep require no more care than any other breed but they do thrive much better in our gentler climate. We are 700ft up here and have frosts through till May so we are hardly the mild climate of south Devon. We are however gentler than the 1500ft they were running them at in Wales and Scotland. Lowland or moorland is fine but not high hill country.
I have the highest possible health status here and belong to umpteen expensive schemes which require blood tests at regular intervals. I have also embarked on semen storage with Innovis, the livestock breeding company. I am committed to keeping this breed going.At the moment it is costing me money because of the health schemes and artificial breeding techniques I am investing in etc but very shortly that will cease. They are , to my mind, well worth it!
Going back to basics and starting new bloodlines in no longer an option to increase numbers. I’ve had long discussions with the original scientists involved and all have said the same thing – a few animals (which is all I could do it with) would be pointless. When they started they had HUNDREDS of ewes bred to Merinos. It was from that point that there was 25 years of selection work done. Far better then to continue with very careful breeding and line breeding with the excellent, stable stock I already have. Many historic rare breeds have recovered from the brink of extinction with far less genetic material than I have here in my Bowmonts.
From a personal, rather anthropomorphic viewpoint, I find the sheep very attractive. Once I accepted that, having spoken ” goat” for several years, I was going to have to learn “sheep”, I hit it off with them. They do speak to me in a very different way but speak they certainly do and as long as I listen, all is well. I have the whole flock bucket trained although they will move easily with Belle, my dog. A couple of bottle fed lambs each year mean there is always someone who will come to see me in the field and the rest of the flock will happily allow me to walk among them. They are not flighty, nor do they jump so the Merino side is definitely dominant over the Shetland. However, they have lost the appalling mothering that Merinos are notorious for. I have never had mothering up problems of any kind. This is fortunate when you consider that only 25% of the genes are Shetland in the original cross. I find their feet absolutely excellent. We never footbath and have never had foot rot.
The wool of course is to die for!!! I have small amounts of fleece for sale to handspinners each year but the vast majority goes to my company buyer which is backing me all the way and is committed to the sheep for the forseeable future. I have to honour that commitment to me and the breed by giving them as much fleece as possible so the amounts for handspinning are limited. This is the trade off I must make in order to ensure a future for these sheep. So to those who have asked for whole fleeces and been offered 100g, that’s the reason!!
I am always happy to see people with a genuine interest in the sheep, particularly anyone interested in keeping them under contract to me. I am currently thinking of offering my wether flocks to people who will keep them and maintain them in return for a guaranteed exceptional income from the wool with of course, a little leeway for sale to handspinners. Anyone interested – get in touch!!
Type Bowmont into the SEARCH button on the RHS of this Blog to find all my posts about the sheep.
I left a message before inquiring about fleece. I am still interested in your 100gr offer. Please can I be on your list of handspinners? Kim MacKenzie
By: Kim MacKenzie on June 3, 2009
at 5:00 pm
Hi Kim,
It’s always tricky to send fleece to the US. It’s technically ilegal unless you get an import licence. The reason is animal health. The USA is quite rightly paranoid about introducing any diseases you don’t already have. Our authorities are too but they are just very bad at enforcing the laws against import.
Even washed, it’s technically not enough. It has to go through a commercial scouring plant – not someone’s kitchen sink.
If it gets stopped by your import border service it will be destroyed and you and I could be fined by our respective authorities.
For the moment I think you must go without. Can you persuade someone to import some sheep from here? That actually would be easier and I’m not joking!!
By: devonfinefibres on June 3, 2009
at 5:29 pm
Are those regulations new? I’ve been buying fleece from England for as many years as I’ve been spinning (oh, okay, it’s only *four*), and I recently got two packages from the British Wool Marketing Board! You couldn’t have sneaked them in all mislabeled, because the fragrance is *distinctive*. My mailman hates me.
–jayne
P.S. Can I be on the Hundred-Gram List too? Every since you announced that partnership with the company buyer, I’ve been hoarding my last few ounces of Bowmont!
By: sgt_majorette on June 3, 2009
at 8:10 pm
Hi Jayne,
No the rules have been in place for many years – it’s just that people either a)don’t know about them or b) deliberately flout them. I need an Export Health Certificate from our government authority to legally export wool to the USA. It requires me to be free from Scrapie (which I am and can prove by membership of the appropriate Health Scheme) and, to have the wool professionally scoured by a commercial plant. This has to be an Approved Establishment and has to be signed off by a State Vet.Since scouring small quantities of Bowmont is not possible in an approved commercial plant, this is a no no.
This is of course, my end. At your end, you need an equivalent licence from USDA to import the said product. My certificate and your import licence need to agree on the batch in question. You see the problems!
Obviously, small trade has been going on for years ilegally but it is ilegal and I can quite see why. Currently, with the scare over BTV in this country, a raw wool export in this very warm summer we are having here could contain a live midge which might get out and infect sheep in the USA. You too of course have your share of expotic animal diseases and trade the other way is also a problem.
Check with USDA and see if I’m right. You might find you get told they will turn a blind eye but I doubt it! When we went through Chicago O’Hare airport three years ago as a bunch of farmers and Agricultural Machinery dealers we were met by USDA on landing and made to disinfect our shoes and were generally treated as though we had the plague! We had been made to fill in forms on the plane saying whether we had been near farms of livestock.
By: devonfinefibres on June 4, 2009
at 3:29 am
Wow! That is surprising. Maybe it’s only for *commercial* import/export? I mean, the BWMB? All those people who sell on eBay?
That’s a lot to think about!
By: sgt_majorette on June 4, 2009
at 3:28 pm
Hi Jayne,
The rules apply to everyone. I’ve just double checked all this with our Export Health people here in the UK and for ANYONE, the Wool Marketing Board, me or anyone else, to export wool to the USA it must be “factory scoured”. Raw wool is not acceptable because even one fleece can carry a disease risk.
I’ve just been sent a specimen copy of the Export Health Certificate required to export wool to the USA and it’s quite clear. The scouring must be done in a commercial unit (not the kitchen sink) and an Official Veterinarian must sign the form to say that is the case. This Export Health Certificate was drawn up in partnership with USDA (I think it’s actually APHIS which deals with your Animal Health), so the requirements are theirs. I think you also need an Import Permit from APHIS but you should check that with them.
The WMB it seems don’t know the rules which doesn’t surprise me one bit. The whole system is a nightmare of complexity. I’m only aware of it because I looked into it all again recently.
So, if you import raw wool to the USA from GB, while you are almost certainly not going to decimate the sheep population of the US with some horrible disease, the risk is certainly there and you may get caught by your import authority and get into trouble.
By: devonfinefibres on June 4, 2009
at 3:41 pm
The people from the BWMB are very nice, but let’s just say I’m not surprised either. One of the fleeces was not something that should have been sent out, for marketing reasons if nothing else.
I just thought, as a quasi-governmental agency, the bureaucracy would have kicked in.
Raising Bowmonts in the US? Not gonna happen. *Nobody* is going to be as careful about preserving the breed as you are!
By: sgt_majorette on June 4, 2009
at 4:05 pm
[...] http://devonfinefibres.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/the-bowmont-sheep/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Happy New Year!! [...]
By: The Bowmont AI programme « Devon Fine Fibres – Life on a very special Devon farm on October 13, 2009
at 1:12 pm